Peer reviewed papers questioning man made climate change

  I have been requested to find a set of peer reviewed papers which contradict the mainstream narrative on man made climate change. There is no shortage yet the media will not tell you they exist so have to rely on the internet which has them all and very easily found. I will add more but these are a representative sample.

When asked by activists what evidence do you have man-made climate change doesn't exist, please refer to this comprehensive and regularly updated list. Yes, lots of qualified scientists don't believe in 'climate change'

46 scientists statements disagreeing with the IPCC

Adjusting temperatures to warming

Adjusting temperatures to warming 2

Adjusting temperatures to warming 3

Adjusting temperatures to warming 4

Hiding lack of warming

Altering sea level upwards

No connections between warming and extreme weather

No connections between warming and extreme weather (Pielke)

No connections between warming and extreme weather (UN)

CO2 levels not connected to warming

CO2 levels not connected to warming 2

CO2 only retains heat for a fraction of a second

Current warming is natural

NASA admit they cannot model cloudsOpen letter to the Bureau of Meteorology

The medieval warm period was real and wiped out

Water vapour is declining, according to NASA's Aqua satellite

Is it warming? (Cornell U) https://arxiv.org/abs/1005.4639
Natural warming. NY Academy of Sciences. https://nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/.../nyas.14920
CO2 sensitivity (Climate Research) https://www.jstor.org/stable/24865955
Floods not increasing in Europe (Nature) https://www.nature.com/articles/nature01928
Fires. No trend or increase in losses (Royal Society) https://royalsocietypublishing.org/.../1696/20150345/22986
Hurricanes not related to climate change (AMS) https://journals.ametsoc.org/.../1520-0434_1998_013_0621...
Rate of sea level rise has barely changed (NASA) https://www.climate.gov/.../climate-change-global-sea-level
Rainfall modelling and prediction is not reliable. (Springer) https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00140173

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The genuine data on the climate

Image
  Both scientists, media and politicians rarely if ever present any of the data on the climate we can all find in a few minutes. I am not offering any reason for this, only doing what they appear unwilling or unable to do. The claims made about our current and future climate appear frightening, but so far I have yet to find a single area which has been made worse by the slight warming we have experienced since the end of the little ice age in the 19th century. The current UN figure we are told to avoid is a 1.5C rise in average temperature, which we are close to in 2026. Few people ever ask or are told its significance, it is just the number they use. Luckily an attendee at the committee which made the decision, Dr Katharine Hayhoe,  was good enough to explain exactly how they came to it:   "There's no magic number of cigarettes that can prevent all damage other than zero. It's too late for that. But we do know that the quicker and the faster we stop smoking, the better o...
Read more

Climate confessions

Image
  It is impossible to lie plausibly for an indefinite period, so sooner or later paid experts who create the scary stories to frighten innocent citizens into handing over their rights are unwittingly going to tell the truth. In law you won't need a trial if the defendants plead guilty, so all the arguments my side make to dismantle their claims won't even be needed once they've admitted the true position themselves. Half of these are direct confessions to the media, the others were hacked from their personal correspondence while they assumed no one would ever see them besides their intended targets. Putting this all together it is fairly impossible not to realise they are pretty much making it all up as they go along as they are under higher orders to produce a consistent picture regardless of the actual data, or fill it in when there is none at all. However, once you read this the rest is just narrative. This was actually Mike Hulme, apologies. However, he did say this, wh...
Read more

Predictions of disaster

Image
 I was just given this comment on X which explains both the science and psychology behind climate change: " And this is nothing compared to the crop failures and ensuing famine, floods, monster hurricanes, expanded ranges of deadly tropical diseases, conflicts over climate fueled migration, air quality from massive wildfires, etc etc."  It encapsulated so well the mindset of the true believers it meant given such a complete statement I will be able to take every element apart until it has all been covered. Firstly, which has already been extensively covered here, in its own order: Crop failures. They saved the worst till first. Crops and other food production has continued to increase per acre as it's been warming. Nothing in the future is likely to change to alter this trend, regardless whether they are connected or not, due to human ability and weather adaptation humans are continually improving food production. To save space and allow flow I won't post multiple ima...
Read more