David's climate blog

 I was just given this comment on X which explains both the science and psychology behind climate change: " And this is nothing compared to the crop failures and ensuing famine, floods, monster hurricanes, expanded ranges of deadly tropical diseases, conflicts over climate fueled migration, air quality from massive wildfires, etc etc."  It encapsulated so well the mindset of the true believers it meant given such a complete statement I will be able to take every element apart until it has all been covered. Firstly, which has already been extensively covered here, in its own order: Crop failures. They saved the worst till first. Crops and other food production has continued to increase per acre as it's been warming. Nothing in the future is likely to change to alter this trend, regardless whether they are connected or not, due to human ability and weather adaptation humans are continually improving food production. To save space and allow flow I won't post multiple ima...

  Before and after 2011- this of course vastly altered the world temperature as a result as well.  Blue- before. Red- after. The black line added to it is the way they made a flat average (green) slope up (red). Here, the IPCC took the soviet-style method of rewriting history. They took their own data and sat on it, squashing a clearly warmer period known throughout written and physical historic records (plants, wine growing etc), although every book written before then also still contains it. Like this one: What does this say about the proxy and other past records we used before they did (which were also the basis of the IPCC's very existence?). More naughtiness from Australia And New Zealand You can also drop the left rather than raise the right, the result is exactly the same. And in Austria, blue, flat, red, rises. Form of individual corrections applied by NOAA. The black line is the adjustment for time of observation. The red line is for a change in maximum/minimum thermo...

Update of an earlier entry: Imagine your lords and masters, who you trusted and believed looked after you, admitted they were lying, cheating and generally openly ripping you off. How would you feel, and how would you react? In fact, I have collected records of this happening for over 40 years, it is on the record officially and totally ignored by the media. Open confessions, the criminal pleading guilty and handing themself over to the authorities, saves millions in court fees and lawyers, and keeping a jury busy for weeks or months. Official enquiries into government wrongdoings take years, and if those involved simply fessed up and their racket was closed down it would save billions or more. Well they have. Over and over again. But people didn't notice. Just show them this and they will. The roots of today's phoney environmental movement (as opposed to the genuine one, which is starved of funds as a direct result) actually mainly lie in the German Volkisch movement of the 19...

 I constantly hear references to the consensus and settled science within climate change, yet on all its foundations everyone within the community is fully aware it is almost entirely based on estimates and speculation. I will now list every area I could find which means the results of using such factors for creating what they put forward as solid claims are false, as once you look at the basis of such claims, some if not most of them are based on fillers. Models couldn't cope with the main coolants, ie aerosols, cloud formation, and where water vapour went to. That means that although the entire AGW theory is based on a small rise in temperature from CO2 causing a far greater one caused by increased water vapour, it's far too complex to model. Especially as the same evaporating oceans can cause cooling from increasing the total cloud cover. Modelling problems   Cloud modelling problems Conclusions • clouds have strong and varying radiative impacts on the climate system • cl...